
It is a widespread belief in alternative science that our forefathers possessed a much greater technological knowledge than our schoolbook science is willing to accept. Many of those theories are lacking serious foundation and are often based on overdrawn speculations [ like the Manna machine ].
But the theory that electricity was known and used in antiquity
seems to rest on a much more stable foundation. The key to the whole theory lies a few hundred kilometers east of
Egypt, in today's Iraq. There some strange pots were found. Some
contained watertight copper cylinders, glued into the opening with
asphalt. In the middle of the cylinder was an iron rod, held in
place also with asphalt. The excavator who found the first of these
pots in 1936 was sure: this is a galvanic element, a primitive
battery. Reconstructions did indeed show that it was possible to
create electricity with it.
Another key element for the electro-thesis is actually something
that is missing.
It's a riddle where schoolbook science is
capitulating. Soot. In none of the many thousands of subterranean
tombs and pyramid shafts was found a single trace of soot, as we are
told by the authors of the electro-thesis, although many of these
tombs are full of often colourful paintings. But the primitive light
sources the Egyptians knew (candles, oil lamps etc.) are always
leaving soot and are using oxygen. So how DID the Egyptians get
their light? Some rationalists are arguing with mirrors, but the
quality of the copper plates the Egyptians used as mirrors were not
good enough for that.
